historical perspective


Dr Angela Davis

“There’s a strong cultural message that somehow having an elective C-section is an ‘easier’ way to give birth.” Dr AngelaRead more →


Dr Angela Davis

“There’s a strong cultural message that somehow having an elective C-section is an ‘easier’ way to give birth.”

Dr Angela Davis is a historian at the University of Warwick, interested in motherhood, parenting and childcare.

Your research has focused primarily on 20th century Britain. Is it possible to talk about universalities of childbirth beyond a particular place or time?

Yes there is universality in the process of birth – but it’s also something which is quite contextually-specific. For women giving birth in the U.K. it’s still a leap into the unknown, the fears are there – but it’s very different to when you’re giving birth in a time or place with a high maternal mortality risk.

Even women giving birth in the U.K. sixty years ago – their mothers’ generation would have had a much more risky experience. They knew those stories, that much more striking association with death which we haven’t really had for he last 40, 50 years.

How have access and attitudes towards Caesarean sections changed since the 1900s?

Small numbers of C-sections were done for hundreds of years but without antibiotics, without blood transfusion, usually resulted in mothers dying. Being able to do a safe C-section was a dramatic improvement and for certain groups of women – for instance those with complicating factors (like rickets, which can deform the pelvis) who were never going to have a good outcome, it was transformative. It allowed them to have a healthy pregnancy and birth.

Rates in the U.K. climbed throughout the second half of the 20th century with a dramatic increase in the last decade, for reasons that aren’t just medical.

When they’re used routinely – perhaps unnecessarily, like as a matter of protocol for a second birth following a C-section delivery – you need to question the evidence-base more closely.

Why do you think this has happened?

Misinformation. Not on a medical level but on a cultural level; the threat of litigation, the influence of the media. There’s a strong cultural message that somehow having an elective C-section is an ‘easier’ way to give birth. When of course the fact is – in this country or any other – it’s major surgery.

If you talk to a woman who has had one the idea that it’s easier – risk of infection, complications with breastfeeding – there’s a gulf between the image and the reality.

Obstetric fistula is a traumatic consequence of obstructed labour – did you come across much discussion of this in your research?

It’s constantly present in women’s stories, but not something that was frequently talked about.

There are many accounts of women living with the legacies of frequent childbirth, but these are the things that really changed after the introduction of the National Health Service (NHS). Suddenly in the 1940s there’s a huge rush of people getting all these conditions they’d been living with for a long time, fixed.

One woman I spoke to had a very difficult experience with fistula. But it was picked up after the birth, she had the surgery and went on to have more children successfully. It was weeks, rather than a lifetime.

Is it helpful to look at the global context?

There are big questions that apply everywhere – the importance placed on reproduction, the resources that are made available, and the relationship between women and the high-level policy decisions that are being made about a women’s issue. Because if it concerned men, the whole thing would be treated very differently everywhere.

And there’s a lot that we can learn from one another – not just taking a ‘western’ approach and applying it on a global scale, but vice versa, seeing what works well in different contexts. Still, you need to be cautious.

Why is that?

There’s an element in the U.K. that goes against women and those who criticize their care. It’s easy to say that if you were in this or that country you’d really have something to be concerned about. When the point is – no one should be in that scenario to begin with.

You need women to be well-informed, empower them to know their bodies, their choices – but you need a system that empowers them as well.

What impact do you think personal storytelling can have in changing opinion and practice?

It’s so important. Most of the effective campaigning groups – AIMS, NCT – started with women sharing their stories. There’s an immediacy that touches people in ways that statistics can’t.

Stories are part of the universal, the global context. We can identify with stories of women giving birth in other places, even if you know the context is different – there’s something about having a child you can identify with. These personal stories are really vital.